- #Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues install
- #Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues driver
- #Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues software
Get:1 precise-updates/main libjpeg62 i386 6b1-2ubuntu1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed:Ġ upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 379 not upgraded.Īfter this operation, 201 kB of additional disk space will be used.
#Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues install
So I had to install the libjpeg62 from 'buntus sudo apt-get install libjpeg62 Now it complained about dependency on a package that wasn't already on the system, and since I was using dpkg to install the binary package from Mustek, the dependency issue wasn't dealt with automatically. 90105 files and directories currently installed.)ĭpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libsane:ĭpkg: error processing libsane (-install):ĭependency problems - leaving unconfigured and re-ran the downgrade-command that previously sudo dpkg -i -force-downgrade libsane_1.0.19-1_b Ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot Purging configuration files for sane-utils. 90120 files and directories currently installed.) This time it complained of file overwrite between packages, so I removed all traces of the sane-utils package from 'buntu sudo dpkg -P sane-utils Trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/sane-find-scanner', which is also in package sane-utils 1.0.22-7ubuntu1Įrrors were encountered while processing: ĭpkg: error processing libsane_1.0.19-1_b (-install): Preparing to replace libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 (using libsane_1.0.19-1_b). 90121 files and directories currently installed.) So I started installation of Musteks binaries, ie downgrade to Musteks sudo dpkg -i -force-downgrade libsane_1.0.19-1_bĭpkg: warning: downgrading libsane from 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 to 1.0.19-1A3IIIU2. it didn't work with SANEs distributed backend.
#Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues software
Which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).Īnd with SUDO for good sudo scanimage -L If you were expecting something different,Ĭheck that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the Now I felt optimistic, could it bee I'd wasted time installing Musteks binary on the live-cd session in vain? Was it in Kubuntus depot after all? But this was not the case, as the next query scanimage -L # found the scanner devices, be sure to adjust access permissions as # You may want to run this program as root to find all devices.
![scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues](https://mustek.de/files/23177/highres/A3F1200N.19.png)
# Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports # Not checking for parallel port scanners. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
![scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues](https://c.dns-shop.ru/thumb/st4/fit/800/650/5bac36709d3b71e30d6c0877318210ac/7b5fc17f0ab5ff24906727ea812be201def5488d258c27eab0f393bb3f42e372.jpg)
# Your USB scanner was (probably) detected.
#Scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues driver
# you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.įound USB scanner (vendor=0x055f, product=0x040b, chip=SQ113?) at libusb:001:004 If you expected something different, make sure that # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer. # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. So the basic USB system connects with the scanner, as sane-find-scanner Optical Tilt Wheel Mouseīus 001 Device 004: ID 055f:040b Mustek Systems, Inc. DataTraveler 2.0 4GB Flash Drive / Patriot Xporter 32GB (PEF32GUSB) Flash Driveīus 002 Device 002: ID 046d:c019 Logitech, Inc. I've always preferred KDE over Gnome, so I downloaded Kubuntu 12.04 (386) and installed it on an old laptop I had lying.Īfter installing this old Kubuntu on this old laptop, I proceeded with installing the package from Mustek:įirst I made the usual queries to the lsusbīus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hubīus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hubīus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hubīus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hubīus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hubīus 001 Device 003: ID 13fe:1f00 Kingston Technology Company Inc. So I tried it and succeded in getting it installed on a 32bit live-cd session.
![scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues scanexpress a3 usb 1200 pro issues](https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImageCompressAll1280/38-135-002-06.jpg)
I was a bit surprised by this, but took a closer look at the version their binary was stated to be and figured that ubuntu has a similar version in their 12.04 release. But no such luck at first try I was unable to navigate the dependency jungle apt threw at me when asking dpkg to downgrade libsane to the binary from Mustek. Currently I'm using Linux Mint 'Rosa' (17.3) as my day-to-day-system, and my thinking was back-tracking ~three years + one step closer to debian should lower risks for incompatibilities. I decided to investigate if the binary deb package distributed by Mustek could work, and started by downloading Ubuntu 14.04 thinking that going there would be reasonable since the Mustek binaries where published Dec 9, 2014.